Addressing OKC’s Demons: On Russell Westbrook, Scott Brooks And The Thunder Youngsters

Basketball, Furious Stylez — By on February 28, 2014 at 2:18 pm


There is a fine line between being a good and being a great team in the NBA. The worst thing that a team could be in in the NBA is a middle-of-the-pack team, more so than any of the other major sports. The Oklahoma City Thunder in its short time together has experienced life on both sides of the line. They’ve been a good team that no one expected much from and then ascended to a perennial contender that has risen to the top of the Western Conference. Now as the NBA season gears into its most exhilarating stretch on the road to the playoffs, the Thunder are left with several issues that should be noted.

Maintaining a strong bench presence

We all know that the Thunder will live and die by how well Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook and, quiet as it’s kept, Serge Ibaka perform. With that said, there needs to be a strong commitment in utilizing their backup players in roles that fit their abilities. In the 27 games that Westbrook missed, Reggie Jackson was forced to step into a starter role that allowed OKC to continue operating at a fluid pace. Jackson not only excelled as the starting point guard, but his play restarted the outrageous “get rid of Westbrook” nonsense that seems to come into play every so often. While Jackson is certainly no Russell Westbrook, he is a solid rotation player when he’s in his comfort zone.

That said comfort zone has been out of whack since the return of Westbrook to the starting lineup. Jackson has played poorly since being relegated back to the bench and just seems lost when he checks in. That’s an issue that also seems to be plaguing Jeremy Lamb, whose sole purpose is to provide an offensive spark off the bench. The second-year player has seen his role increase dramatically this season, and while he has shown promise at times, Lamb for the most part isn’t fooling anybody. Derek Fisher might return to old form with big-time shots come playoff time, but nobody expects to see that consistently. Lamb and Jackson have to get out of their own way so OKC isn’t left looking like slim pickings when the starters are in need of extended rest.

A healthy Kendrick Perkins is a necessity

OK, from a basketball standpoint it’s obvious why no one really wants to see Kendrick Perkins on a court. Offensively he doesn’t provide much of anything, and on the other side of the ball he definitely isn’t the acclaimed defensive stopper many believed he was once upon a time. In fact, most people would find it hard to really say what it is that Perkins does in fact bring to the Thunder. Well if nothing else, he brings familiarity. Good team chemistry is just as important to a championship-contending team as the talent within it. There is a reason why Perkins remains a starter on this team, against all of the criticism (and there is indeed an abundance of it) against him.

Perk is a proven leader for OKC and allows everyone who plays around him to perform in his natural role. He’s a reliable presence in Scott Brooks’ system, something that a player like Steven Adams hasn’t been able to provide. Adams’ style of play hasn’t only been raw and considerably inexperienced, but almost detrimental at times. Perkins isn’t going to secure a win for the Thunder, but he doesn’t do anything that will lose the game for them. He is well-aware of his limits and doesn’t overcompensate by any stretch. As of now, he most likely won’t be back from injury until the beginning of the playoffs, and if this current three-game stretch without him is any indication, OKC is going to need him. The Thunder have not won since Perk got hurt, and no combination of Steven Adams and Hasheem Thabeet could replace the presence of Kendrick Perkins. Come on now, Hasheem Thabeet?

Will Scott Brooks finally surprise us for once?

Scott Brooks has been a great coach for the Thunder, but he’s also been a pretty predictable one. With Perkins out of the lineup for an extended amount of time, we finally get to see just how creative Brooks can be.  As mentioned, Steven Adams is more detrimental to this team than anything else, so I truly believe Brooks will experiment here.  Perhaps he will create more small-ball lineups that feature Ibaka at the 5 with Durant at the 4 and a Jeremy Lamb or Perry Jones on the wing. It certainly wouldn’t hurt to test out and would break the redundancy that Brooks has used his entire time in OKC. Neither Reggie Jackson nor Jeremy Lamb are in the same mold of James Harden, so expecting them to consistently dazzle in the sixth-man role might not help in the grand scheme of things. Thabo Sefolosha is a vital defensive player in the starting lineup, but I’d be more curious to see how well Reggie Jackson and Westbrook could perform together if they both started. As mentioned before, Jackson hasn’t adjusted well to coming off the bench lately, so perhaps letting him dictate the start of games is an alternative. Of course, Brooks most likely won’t get that creative, but the options are all there.

Esau Howard

Esau Howard is a Friend of the Program, a hoops enthusiast, and a sports scribe that appreciates the life shortening stress of competition at it's finest. Follow his musings on Twitter.

More Posts

Follow Me:

Tags: , , , , , ,


  • Excellent stuff here. I agree with every single point except that Perk one. I’m not gonna lie, Perk is a complete liability at this point in my mind. He has absolutely 0 offensive skill and simply can’t guard the majority of players in this league.

    While Steven Adams is indeed raw and sometimes awkward, at least he can run the floor and has some athleticism. Hell, if he plays more, I can even see him getting more comfortable and adding a dimension Perkins can’t give this team.

    By no means do I think he can be a difference maker, but I’d rather let him grow out there in the hopes he feels more comfortable come playoff time than on relying on a slow, plodding, offensively deficient Perk.

    Honestly, if Russ can get his legs back under him and Jackson/Lamb come back around, this team has a chance – mostly residing on Wade’s knees – to break through. I still the Heat, and mainly LeBron, are too good, but this won’t be a 2012 scenario should those 2 meet again.

  • Joe Simmons says:


    I agree to a degree on Perk but I’m not ready to give up on him. He can be an asset. Russy is the wildcard here. When he gets his rhythm back OKC is going to be a problem. It seems like Lamb’s productivity went down since Russy returned. He was playing at a high level. If he can find his way then watch out.

    Esau .. Good stuff man. Nice insight.

    • I definitely agree that Russ is the X-factor. If he gets back to full health, this team can legitimately win the whole thing – especially if Lamb and Jackson get back to form. Agreed, good stuff.

      And I guess I can see Perk maybe doing things against Hibbert or something, but I just think that injury took away what little explosiveness he had. He hasn’t been the same defensive force since — and who knows, maybe it was KG who made him look so great on that end of the floor.

  • Esau Howard says:

    Ha,thanks fellas.

    In the case of Perkins though, you guys have no idea how much I had really ponder his actual value to this team. I just know that if OKC loses or wins a game, it won’t be because of anything Perkins does/doesn’t do. Adams is definitely a talent that can be groomed, but right now he isn’t at a point where I would rely on him more than Perk. Not sure if that means I’m overvaluing Perkins, or if I really just don’t like Steve Adams style of play. Maybe both? I just know Perkins provides……something intangible to that team.

Leave a Reply


Leave a Trackback